turbomaxim Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 Da ardeleni de ce vorbesc romana ciudat , da bucuresteni dc vb romana ciudat da tu dc esti asa ciudat?intrebari de genu acesta imi puneam pe la 6-7 ani .Nu e vina ta, te inteleg
pizza200 Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 lol cand eram mic ma intrebam dc nu pot sa fiu nemuritor:D
bunny Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 @ repet B) de ce crestem? :(Pentru ca...putem? :-?
pizza200 Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 Pentru ca...putem? :-?mda e naspa as vrea sa am mereu 16 ani :bananadance2:
bunny Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 lol cand eram mic ma intrebam dc nu pot sa fiu nemuritor:DDe ce? Ai reusit sa-l decapitezi pe Duncan McLeod si n-ai devenit nemuritor? >.<
pizza200 Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 De ce? Ai reusit sa-l decapitezi pe Duncan McLoud si n-ai devenit nemuritor? >.<cine e ala :-?
bunny Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 cine e ala :-?Cum spune si titlul topicului, intrebare stupida. :D Come on, The Highlander, nu-l stii? :D In fine, era un nemuritor. >.<LE: sry, McLeod*. >.<
Mehico Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 Cum spune si titlul topicului, intrebare stupida. :D Come on, The Highlander, nu-l stii? :D In fine, era un nemuritor. >.<LE: sry, McLeod*. >.<Trebuia sa spui Chuck Norris... vi si tu cu dinastia :lol:
pizza200 Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 Cum spune si titlul topicului, intrebare stupida. :D Come on, The Highlander, nu-l stii? :D In fine, era un nemuritor. >.<LE: sry, McLeod*. >.<aaa am auzit de el ,parca era misto!!...i'm the hightlander!!!!!hehe
afroMAN Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 mda e naspa as vrea sa am mereu 16 ani :bananadance2:eu ma multumesc cu 5 :PDe ce trebuie sa suferim uneori? :D
bunny Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 eu ma multumesc cu 5 :PDe ce trebuie sa suferim uneori? :DPentru ca....vrem? :D
Domino628 Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 De ce mai dau din gura "artistele" cand le canta CD-ul?
Domino628 Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 Ca sa-si umple buzunarele, desigur. >.< Oricum le umple,ca sunt destui cretini care sa cumpere albumul,problema e ca nu inteleg de ce ele mai mimeaza pe scena,pt ca oricum lumea isi da seama ca nu e LIVE mai bine ar sta jos pe un scaun,sau ar dansa...sau chiar sa plece de pe scena
-HoneyBfly- Posted January 10, 2009 Posted January 10, 2009 Da ardeleni de ce vorbesc romana ciudat , da bucuresteni dc vb romana ciudat da tu dc esti asa ciudat?:lol: @Nu va mai luatzi de moldoveni <_<
nu ma cunosti Posted January 11, 2009 Posted January 11, 2009 Daca azi sunt 0 grade.. si maine va fi de doua ori mai frig.. cate grade vor fi maine ? :>
nu ma cunosti Posted January 11, 2009 Posted January 11, 2009 De ce zicem ca am cazut jos?e pleonasm.. tu poti sa cazi sus ?
Diabolik_01 Posted January 12, 2009 Posted January 12, 2009 Trebuia sa spui Chuck Norris... vi si tu cu dinastia :lol: Chuck can do it Prima mea intrebare serioasa : Ce sunt alea lesbience? (prea multe filme #-o )
Lucian Posted January 12, 2009 Posted January 12, 2009 ^ poate prea PUTINE filme Oricum le umple,ca sunt destui cretini care sa cumpere albumul,problema e ca nu inteleg de ce ele mai mimeaza pe scena,pt ca oricum lumea isi da seama ca nu e LIVE mai bine ar sta jos pe un scaun,sau ar dansa...sau chiar sa plece de pe scena isi da tataie seama ca e live? -_-
gigicarnat Posted February 1, 2009 Posted February 1, 2009 1.care a fost primul oul sau gaina 2.credeam ca pamantul e plat si daca mergi prea mult intr-un singur sens ai sa cazi (pe la 5-6 ani) 3.de ce lua sormea bataie cand eu eram de vina.... 4.de ce luam bataie dupa ce lua sormea bataie ca eu am facut o nazbatie.
b1ackic3 Posted February 1, 2009 Posted February 1, 2009 1.A team made up of a geneticist, philosopher and chicken farmer claim to have found an answer. It was the egg.Put simply, the reason is down to the fact that genetic material does not change during an animal's life.Therefore the first bird that evolved into what we would call a chicken, probably in prehistoric times, must have first existed as an embryo inside an egg.Professor John Brookfield, a specialist in evolutionary genetics at the University of Nottingham, told the UK Press Association the pecking order was clear.The living organism inside the eggshell would have had the same DNA as the chicken it would develop into, he said."Therefore, the first living thing which we could say unequivocally was a member of the species would be this first egg," he added. "So, I would conclude that the egg came first."The same conclusion was reached by his fellow "eggsperts" Professor David Papineau, of King's College London, and poultry farmer Charles Bourns.Mr Papineau, an expert in the philosophy of science, agreed that the first chicken came from an egg and that proves there were chicken eggs before chickens.He told PA people were mistaken if they argued that the mutant egg belonged to the "non-chicken" bird parents."I would argue it is a chicken egg if it has a chicken in it," he said."If a kangaroo laid an egg from which an ostrich hatched, that would surely be an ostrich egg, not a kangaroo egg."Bourns, chairman of trade body Great British Chicken, said he was also firmly in the pro-egg camp.He said: "Eggs were around long before the first chicken arrived. Of course, they may not have been chicken eggs as we see them today, but they were eggs."2.asta credeau si religiosii acum cateva mii de ani .3.pentru ca erai mai mic probabil.4.probabil ca parintii tai erau niste alcoolisti , care credeau ca singura solutie e bataia .
